98-06-24- 12 Pages Document

Document given personally to the FBI Albany and Commission of Civil Right Washington

98-06-24- 14 Pages Document

THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN WRITTEN TO RESTORE PUBLICLY MY MENTAL CREDIBILITY IN USA.

A letter was written by the Quebec Life Insurance Society SSQ and the Quebec Disability Pension RRQ to the USA Immigration Service. On August 1992 the RRQ refuse to inform my Lawyer Mr. Pierre Rochefort why they send me a full mental disability pension. When I made application for a Mortgage in the USA, the SSQ and RRQ sent them a letter informing them of this pension as a Quebec full disable pension. They repeated the same process to my US lawyer Mr. David Hand who was representing me for an automobile accident. Mr. David Hand advised me I couldn't ask for any compensation for my injuries because I was receiving a disability pension from the Quebec Government. Now this Quebec pension of full mental disability which was placed on me illegally and is therefore criminal and is directly affecting my mental integrity and limiting my ability to receive health and life Insurance in the USA. In addition I am unable to secure employment to provide an income for my family and me.

I describe below the highlights of this Canadian medical case and advise any lawyer who wants to help in the US Civil Court, everything that is described below has already been deposited in a Canadian Court and have in my possession the proof of everything I reported in this document.

This Quebec Canadian true story was written in a three-act melodrama.

PART-I. Description of who was involved, associated, covered up the facts and profited from this situation of the Canadian criminal medical report for their own personal profit concerning the CDRIL technology (The Global Localization System) and the new industrial financing concept.

WHO WAS INVOLVED

1. A- The Montreal South-Shore Transportation Society (CTRSM),

B- the medical office of Medisys Health Group Inc.,

C- the Quebec Workers Federation (FTQ) Union and

D- the Quebec Government.

WHO ASSISTED with:

2. A- the (IVAC) Crime Victims Assistance Bureau branch of the (C.S.S.T.) Quebec Workplace Health and Safety),

B- the CSST (Quebec Workplace Health and Safety),

C- the (R.R.Q.) Quebec Pension Plan and

D- the Quebec Life Insurance Society SSQ.

Note: The CTRSM medical office, Medisys Health Group Inc., is a Group of 400 doctors who process most all medical claims for all branches of the Quebec Government and the SSQ.

WHO COVERED UP THE FACTS with:

3. A- the Longueuil City Police,

B- the St. Hubert City Police,

C- the (Quebec Provincial Police) Surety of Quebec reporting

D- to the Public Security Minister, who is affiliated with

E- the Quebec Minister of Justice and

F- the Quebec Provincial Prosecutor. Three branches of the Federal Security Police who are:

G- the Royal Canadian Gendarmery (GRC),

H- the Royal Canadian Mountain Police (RCMP), and

I- the Canadian Institute Secret Service (CISS) by whom I was directly refereed by the FBI in 1986.

WHO COVERED UP THE FACTS with:

4. A- The Administration of the Canadian Justice Minister and

B- the Canadian Army was informed of the three Province's involved in my civil and criminal cases. The cases were with the CTRSM in Quebec, the Toronto Transportation commission (CTT) Ottawa, Ontario associated with Hamilton, Missisauga and the WR inc. Vancouver.

WHO PROFITED FROM THIS SITUATION:

5. A- The Ontario Provincial Authorities and

B- the Canadian Federal Government provided approximately 75% of the financing for the Smart Bus project to CTT.

C- the WR Inc. Quebec Branch of Vancouver BC obtained financing by:

D- the Canadian Federal Bank of Development,

E- the Quebec Government and

F- the CTRSM.

G- The FTQ create the Solidarity Fund, a replica of the CDRIL new industrial financing concept, and received 20 millions in 1985 from the Quebec government and the Federal Canadian Government.

NOTE:

The WR Inc. Quebec is also related with CTT by their head office at Vancouver BC and the Canadian Federal Support Research. The Canadian Federal Bank of Development and the CTT were all informed by Mr. Gilles Roy, the CTRSM General Director of the Special Projects about the details of CDRIL Project in 1980 in order to secure funding for this project. Also Mr. Gilles Roy communicated by letter to Mr. Pristupa project engineer at CTT on September 9, 1980 requesting more details concerning the communication system.

Scene-I Act I

Two scenes were played in CTRSM territory

1. On Sept. 7, 1985, after I reported a security threat, as defined per article 16.01 of the CTRSM contract, to the passengers and myself. The CTRSM placed me on a 10-day medical leave of absence at the Saint Hubert and Longueuil CTRSM office. An inspector and his supervisor titled a chief Inspector conferred with Denise Laplante to make this decision.

NOTE:

Article 16.01 reads as follows: "CTRSM must take the necessary measures to ensure the security, health, and well being of its employees during working hours".

2. The Inspector and Chief Inspector did not have the qualifications to make a medical, psychological, or criminal investigation into the validity of my security report or my personal well being.

3. Denise Laplante, the CTRSM Human Resource Director, decided to place me on medical leave without transferring or referring me to a hospital emergency room, which is contrary to normal protocol as described in the article 16.01 of CTRSM contract. The medical evaluation report can confirm this by Dr. Pelletier and the CTRSM medical records.

4. The CTRSM and the FTQ Union backed her decision knowing that she has no medical qualification for such a decision.

5. Dr. Pelletier on Sept. 17, 1985, endorse the CTRSM and Dr. Pelletier had already made an appointment for Sept. 17, 1985, the same day with Dr. Goineau.

6. Dr. Goineau saw me on September 17, 1985 and again on November 14, 1985. On November 14, 1985, I advised him I wanted to make a trip to the USA to see some family friends. He agreed and though that a trip could help me to eliminate my anxiety.

7. In the USA with the assistance of a family friend, I supposed to see a lawyer. The lawyer who had received some information concerning my Canadian case communicates with the FBI at the New Haven Connecticut office. They ask I saw them before I saw the attorney. After I explain to them what was going on they contact the CIA in Washington. After I talked to them, they said they would contact the Canadian Intelligence Service Society CISS and counsel to do the same. I went to see the CISS the following days.

8. Effectively the CISS confirmed that the FBI had made contact with them and told me three things I should do. One of them was "I need to past a psychiatrist evaluation because they thought that within Six months the CTRSM would put me on mental disability".

9. I listen to CISS and on Nov. 22, 1985, I ask Dr. Goineau to make an appointment with the hospital Psychiatrist and he did for the same day, Nov. 22, 1985, with Dr. Coriolan psychiatrist at St John Hospital in Quebec. Dr. Coriolan stated On Feb. 24, 1985 the medical diagnosis of Dr. Goineau adaptation with anxious humor was temporary and not confirmed on Nov. 22, 1985. I asked him if he could send a letter for Canada Life Insurance for my car payment insurance and if he can completed the SSQ Insurance medical report Filled by the CTRSM for the SSQ who paid part of my salary for medical absence.

10. He agreed to send a letter for Mrs. Tougas of Canada life Insurance for my car payment on Feb.24 1986 but he refuse to endorse my leave of absence for Sept. 7,1985 to Feb.24 1986 and told me it was Dr. Pelletier responsibility to complete that report. Stating the real reason why he stopped me from working.

11. The CTRSM gave me a 2nd report, which was a blank report, to be filled by Dr. Coriolan. I met with him on Feb. 28, 1985 and Dr. Coriolan got angry when he realize they set him up and he wrote a letter Saying: "By the psychiatrist evaluation Mr. Morel didn't had any evidence of mental disease. In consequence Mr. Morel is in good mental health ", so he didn't filled that second SSQ report. Dr. Coriolan gave me this letter for CTRSM, and a photocopy of his letter sent in February 24, 1985 for my car insurance. That's when I knew what the letter contained.

12. I gave the letter from Dr. Coriolan to the CTRSM medical office and asked them to give me a copy for my own records and they agreed. The CTRSM made and Appointment with Dr. Pelletier for March 17,1986.

PART- II Scene-II Act two: The Dr. Pelletier commits perjury

1. The CTRSM failed to inform me that on March 17, 1986 Dr. Marcel Pelletier had signed a medical report stating that I was able to return to work and never wrote on this type written statement gave to Judge Dulude this medical report stating that I was able to return to work.

NOTE:

See letters in denunciation/summon document page 11, letter from the CTRSM dated on April 9,1986 advised me I had a return to work from Dr. Pelletier on march 17, 1986.I receive this letter 5 day after I saw Dr. Gauthier general Practitioner at Charles Lemoyne Hospital at the request of the CSST. On April 10 the CSST, stangely and not at my request, had transferred my case to IVAC.

2. The dispatcher and CTRSM Chief Dispatcher claimed they never received oral or written communication advising them I could return to work and they couldn't tell me why they didn't send me my medical leave of absence Paycheck. Their only answer was the head office of CTRSM probably made a mistake.

3. The next day the dispatcher told me that my check was cancelled and is at the CTRSM office. The reason was I had been given the "OK" to return to work two weeks earlier by Dr. Pelletier and I was not aware of this fact.

4. I met with Dr. Pelletier on March 25,1986. Dr. Pelletier never mentioned to me that he had released me from medical leave to return to work on March 17,1986. He had submitted his handwritten evaluation to the CTRSM on March 17, 1986. After March 25, 1986 there is no hand written notes but a typed report from the CTRSM medical office and signed by Dr. Pelletier.

5. On April 19, 1988 the first grievance was made by the CTRSM to force me to pay the fee of Dr. Brunet and eliminate the FTQ Unions opposition of Dr. Brunet qualification as the 3rd Doctor and qualified as specified in the article 33.05 of the CTRSM employees contract to make the interpretation of the two opposite medical Diagnostics' by four doctors as to my condition:

6. A)-Good health by Dr. Coriolan a psychiatrist at St John Hospital and Dr. Gauthier general Practitioner at Charles Lemoyne Hospital.

7. B)-Poor health by the two Medisys Health Group Inc. doctors representing CTRSM. The Medisys Doctors were Dr. Sioufy; a psychiatrist who unexpectedly died 10 day prior to the scheduled court Appearance and Dr. Pelletier general practitioner who, consulted with Dr. Sioufy, diagnosed me full mental disability.

8. On June 1988 the 2nd grievance was made by the FTQ Union when the CTRSM fired me. The reason gave by the CTRSM to fired me was:

a-) Voluminous absence report from January 5, 1981 to January 25,1984 and september 9, 1985 to June 01,1988.

The first absence I was on compensation after an accident at the CTRSM.

The second was because the CTRSM stop me working by an inspector and his supervisor titled a chief Inspector who had conferred with Denise Laplante the CTRSM Human Resource Director who make the decision and cover by their own doctor from Medisys.

PS. (This was rejected by Judge Dulude. See judgment page 1and 2)

b-) A permanent full mental disability gives by different expertise.

The three doctors who gave me this diagnosis are all from the Medisys the official by contract CTRSM medical office.

PS. (This part was never debated and was the first grievance the Judge Dulude report on his Judgment to refereed for the validity of his own Judgment. See judgment page 24, last paragraph and 25, first and second paragraph)

This 2nd grievance was schedule strangely before the first grievance. At the question I asked to the FTQ Union President Mr. Champagne why we need to proceed before the first one, he told me, " we past the 2nd grievance hearing before because we save the time delay if we lose the 1st grievance.

9. A room was rented in a Holiday Inn near Longueuil CTRSM office for the second grievance hearing for the worker Arbitration court.

10. Two medical appointment schedules and the note from those evaluation were deposited in the worker arbitration court at the second grievance hearing.

11. By the deposition we can see how the CTRSM manipulate Dr. Pelletier notes.

12. Notes from Dr. Pelletier generalist deposited in court by Dr. Pelletier for Judge Dulude.

13. I met with Dr, Pelletier on March 17,1986, Dr. Pelletier advised that he was still in charge of my case and that Dr. Coriolan by letter medical reports on February 28 1986 Dr. Pelletier had written on his own note that " Serge didn't require Psychiatric treatment. Serge could return to work, need to talk with his supervisor before".

14. On March 25, 1986, Dr. Pelletier had written on his own notes: " meeting the CTRSM supervisor and the Employee Aid Program representative and talked with Serge. Serge can't return to work. Serge hopes he can go to the U.S.A. and he has already transferred his case to the CSST for acceptance".

15. The CTRSM prosecutor deposited a typed script notes sign by Dr. Pelletier also, in Judge Dulude's court about Serge Morel's medical report.

16. On this medical type written statement, they made one comment for two different dates January 17, 1986 and March 14, 1986.

17. The department of CTRSM Human Resource directed by Denise Laplante and supervised by the CTRSM President, wrote on this type written statement, " His emotional state hadn't changed and he didn't have any therapy running ".

18. This type written statement prepared by the CTRSM is in total contradiction with Dr. Pelletier handwritten notes and the medical report of Dr. Coriolan psychiatrist given to Dr. Pelletier but Dr. Pelletier signed this report anyway.

19. In court Mr. Morin, lawyer for the FTQ Union questioned the CTRSM "Why parts of the Doctors hand written notes where omitted from the type written report. Specifically the March 14, 1986 and March 25, 1986 meeting.

20. What is surprising is that Dr. Pelletier in Judge Dulude's court confirmed the meeting between the CTRSM and PAE and advised the court he changed his diagnosis from good health to total medical disability. Later we learned the PAE was not involved in the change of diagnosis, only the CTRSM. Therefore the Dr. Pelletier perjured himself.

21. Strangely, the FTQ Union who was representing me had knowledge of the perjury but never advised their own lawyer and Mr. Pierre Rochefort and me.

22. In January of 1989 PAE, President Mr. Fontaine advised the Union he had learned Dr. Pelletier was using PAE Organization name in Court. Mr. Fontaine reminded the FTQ Union local that the PAE was never involved in the medical decision.

23. When I learned of the CTRSM, Dr. Pelletier and the collusion from Mr. Fontaine (PAE) on May 1989, three days before my testimony in Judge Dulude's court and I was the last one, I contacted my personal lawyer Mr. Pierre Rochefort (he was not my trial attorney). My personnel counsel Mr.Pierre Rochefort apprises the FTQ Union lawyer, Mr. Morin.

24. At the end of the court session, the FTQ Union and CTRSM prosecutor advise the Judge they made an agreement to eliminated all testimony involving the PAE. The only witness who had refereed to the PAE organization was the Dr. Pelletier. He used it, as a reason to explain why he changes his medical report of good health to total medical disability in is testimony.

25. The FTQ Union and CTRSM prosecutor refused to tell the Judge why they want him to cancel any testimony involving the PAE in his judgment. The Judge Dulude respects this CTRSM and FTQ Union collusion. The only remaining evidence of Dr. Pelletier's perjury are his medical notes submitted at the hearings and letters from the two PAE President testifying to the lack of PAE involvement in my medical status.

26. The FTQ lawyer, Mr. Morin had the mandate to represent me. I wasn't allowed to testify and I didn't understand the proceedings why the Judge didn't asked me these questions or ask me to take the witness stand to obtain some information’s.

27. After court we were told by Mr. Morin the PAE was left out of the judgement to protect the integrity of medical file privacy for all CTRSM employees. The unbelievable is Mr. Morin had the knowledge I didn't have any medical file at the PAE Organization and Dr.Pelletier, the CTRSM criminally used the PAE organization to cover them with the agreement of the FTQ Union.

28. That was the reason CTRSM, Medisys Health Group Inc., FTQ and Dr. Pelletier conspired to cover Dr. Pelletier's criminal perjury. Dr. Pelletier changed his medical diagnosis by CTRSM request with the acceptance of the FTQ Union.

29. The CTRSM Records of March 14, 1986 and March 25, 1986, these meeting have disappeared the same way as later the files at the Montreal Superior Court. At the Montreal Superior Court the CTRSM Prosecutor told the judge that I was on full mental disability and the file I spoke of never existed only in my head. That way they obtained the lapsing request of my case no 500-05-016630-814 in Quebec Canadian Court on may 19, 1988. Two weeks later the ombudsman found the file in a box not filed.

30. Dr. Coriolan psychiatrist at St. John's Hospital refused to sign the CTRSM reports dated for September 07,1985 to February 24, 1986. Dr. Alain Gauthier general practitioner refused also another CTRSM reports dated for September 07,1985 to April 4,1986 that's why he gave me is usual personal medical report date on April 07, 1986, as can be seen on page 27 of in my denunciation/summon document.

31. The CTRSM Human Resource directed by Denise Laplante and supervised by the CTRSM President was looking two time for another doctor to justify my medical absence on September 07,1985 to February 24,1986 and later to April 4, 1986.

32. The only parties responsible for my medical absence were the CTRSM, the FTQ Union and Dr. Pelletier of the Medisys Health Group Inc.

33. The FTQ didn't represent me in my medical case until 1987, when Mr. Boulerice a lawyer at the ST. John office of the Quebec Governmental Legal Advisors, sent a certified letter to the FTQ Union, compelling the F.T.Q. Union to legally represent me against the CTRSM.

34. Dr. Alain Gauthier of Charles Lemoyne Hospital cleared me to return to work on June 4, 1986. Again the CTRSM, Medisys, and Dr. Pelletier stopped my return and criminally manipulated my medical report. As a result of these changes to my medical report and publicly communicating this information in court, I was not allowed to tell Judge Dulude that the CTRSM had committed criminal fraud. This criminal manipulation of my medical report done by the CTRSM medical office Doctor from Medisys.

35. The CTRSM criminally assisted:

A-) by Medisys who declared me as a full mental disability person,

B-) by the FTQ who made many criminal abstentions in this medical representation of my defense,

C-) by the Quebec Government controlling the Quebec Pension Regime RRQ,

D-) by the RRQ who accepted to pay this criminal pension,

E-) by the SSQ on contract with the Quebec Government, after they were informed by myself of this criminal doctors medical manipulation from Medisys, cover that by allowing to paid the criminal full mental disability pension, the CTRSM criminal act was covered by this criminal Pension.

36. Thus the Quebec Government covered up these criminal acts. This by allowing the fully mentally disabled pension from the RRQ and by the SSQ on contract with the Quebec Government. The Quebec Government was covered also by the Canadian Government, even though I objected by many provincial and federal depositions of documents denouncement/summon etc. in court and publicly against this criminal medical report from the CTRSM.

PART –III Act three at the Longueuil Small Claims City Court.

Events, why the CTRSM filed the entry form for the first grievance and the FTQ filed the second Note: The grievance:

On December 14, 1979 Mr. Marcel Fafard CTRSM President Director gave me a letter identify the two projects, included inside the CIDRIL project was my own property. He gave me the authorization to use two or three bus for the electronic prototype of the CDRIL project.

On January 12 1980 Mr. Yves Violletti BAA, HBA, Adm. A was an Aeronautic Counselor from the Transport Material Direction attach to the Quebec Government Industrial, Commerce, Tourism Ministry. He sent a letter to Mr. Andre Meunier Deputy Premier of Mr. Rene Levesque advised him of the importance of the CDRIL project. He gave information that the CDRIL project can finance the cost of the Quebec Transport Commission operation. This represents a profitability of $600 millions per year.

On July 9, 1980 at the demand of Mr. Marcel Fafard CTRSM President Director, he advised us, the project CDRIL need to be incorporated. The CTRSM can't negotiate with a private entity.

On July 11, 1980 I wrote a letter to protect the CTRSM, my legal property the Global Localization System and the entire CDRIL concept. Mr. Marcel Fafard CTRSM President Director, Mr. Ronald Blake IATA Administration Director and Financing Comptroller and Mr. Denis Tremblay CTRSM Industrial Relation Director signed this letter as witnesses.

On July 15, 1980 Mr. Ronald Blake IATA Administration Director and Financing Comptroller refuse to be the CDRIL President but accepted to be the President executive of CDRIL as identified in his Curriculum Vitae.

On November 11, 1980 endorsement of the CTRSM Commissioners.

On November 20, 1980 Mr. Serge Paré, Private secretary of Mr. Bernard Landry minister of Economic State Development, advise us the CDRIL project was a governmental nature.

On December 9, 1980 description of the title:

Mr. Bourbeau Notary, also St. Lambert Mayor and CTRSM Mayor President.

Mr. Parent Quebec Industrial Commissioner and also Boucherville Mayor.

Mrs. Lucie Dion lawyer, also Mayor Secretary, Commissioner Secretary and CTRSM director.

On December 9, 1980 in a private conference Mr. Bourbeau, Mr. Parent and the other mayor had illegally obtain a photocopy of the confidential CDRIL documents by Mrs. Lucie Dion. Mrs. Lucie Dion transmitted without any permission by the CTRSM Commissioners, the CTRSM President General Director or myself. At this private conference, Mr. Claude Bellefleur electronic technician of the CRIQ (Quebec Industrial Research Center) and myself can't understand what going on and wait for the end of this meeting concerning the CDRIL project in case the Mayor had some Questions concerning the project.

They didn't ask any question about it. After this conference Mr. Claude Bellefleur and myself quit because the mayor didn't request us to assist at the CTRSM Public Mayor assembly.

NOTE:

This confidential document contains all the private CDRIL electronic details and all the private CDRIL concept details. The CTRSM Commissioner because of their CTRSM function so to protect the CTRSM against any illegal action and at their request, had received this confidential private document for their private information only, on November 11, 1980. Mr. Bourbeau and Mr. Parent controlled the argumentation with the other mayors against Mr. Fafard. They had the knowledge of the legal responsibility regarding this stolen confidential CDRIL documents by there secretary Mrs. Lucie Dion.

On December 9, 1980 at the public CTRSM Mayor assembly, Mr. Bourbeau, the CTRSM Mayor President, transmit publicly all the CDRIL private confidential documents stolen by Mrs. Lucie Dion and distributed them to all the CTRSM Mayors.

From January 5, 1981 to January 25,1984 I was on worker compensation because of and accident at the CTRSM.

On February 18, 1981 I was endorsed by Mr. Regis Desbiens, Physicist Engineer of the SPAAR, concerning the CDRIL electronic concept.

On October 7,1981 I receive advise from the CRIQ (Quebec Industrial Research Center) to contact some people in Vancouver working on similar project.

On November 25, 1981 deposition of the lawsuit against the CTRSM in Superior Court.

On March 17, 1983 meeting for a settlement of the lawsuit with Mr. Molinie the new CTRSM President General Director, Mr. Cimone the CTRSM attorney and my attorney Mr. Pierre D.Girard.

On February 1984 I had an offer from Mr. Pierre D.Girard saying " $135,000.00 will appear in your bank account from nowhere to close the CTRSM lawsuit. I requested a week to think about it.

On February 10, 1984 he withdraw of the lawsuit after I told him that I went for advise to the GRC about this offer after I advised Mr. Pierre D.Girard I talk about is offer of $135,000.00 appearing on my bank account from nowhere to close the CTRSM lawsuit at the GRC Police. He becomes angry and drops the case.

On September 9,1984 at the demand of the CTRSM attorney I present a new offer to stop my lawsuit.

On February 1985 the first murder attempt I reported it to the St. Hubert City Police. They refereed me to the Quebec Provincial Police (SQ) of St. John County.

On April 30, 1985, the CTRSM pleaded the Judge that I had the capacity of a lawyer that's why they made an objection to report of the case given some time to Mr. Proulx lawyer studied the case.

On June 19, 1985, the files were missing from April 4, 1985 and are still missing for 7th court appearance including this day. I remake a new file all joint in five documents and Mr. Proulx after ask to the Judge if we can make a new deposition of documents to be able to proceed. The CTRSM attorney cut the speech of my attorney and advise the Judge he found the missing file but the person in charge suppose to bring them back. We never saw the file document missing. Regarding the case the Judge said, " You had a request in appeal court to suit Mr. Morel of $24,000.00 and you ask me to declare Mr. Morel insolvent, you are completely immoral and I throw out your demand.

On June, July 1985 Mr. Pierre D.Girard Lawyer tries desperately to put me in bankruptcy.

On July the CTRSM cut all the employees overtime by hiring a over staff and they didn't succeed in cutting down enough all my money to pay Mr. Pierre D.Girard Lawyer who try to bankrupt me.

On July 27, 1985 the second CTRSM murder attempt I reported it to the Longueuil City Police. At this event any CTRSM member gave assistance to the driver and the Longueuil City Police. The bus was abandoned and a civil driver need to bringing back the bus to the subway station CTRSM parking lot. The passenger who helped save the driver life was never compensated for his courage.

On August 1985 I saw Mr. Viau the Longueuil City Police inspector. I informed him that possibly the third murder attempt of the CTRSM driver. This was by different facts reported by Mr. Desrosier the driver involve in the second murder attempt. The fact was a possible relation exists that this event was to covert the second murder attempts on July 27, 1985. Mr. Viau told me this investigation cost too much and I just want to profit of some publicity for my case. He told me also if I was killed never he related this with the CTRSM. This Longueuil City Police inspector was suspended later for incompetence in another case.

On September 7, 1985 I reported some strange event concerning the safety of the bus assigned to me. The CTRSM Human Resource Director Mrs. Denise Laplante decided to place me on medical leave.

On February 28, 1986 Dr. Coriolan advise the Dr. Pelletier I am in good mental health.

On March 17, 1986 Dr. Pelletier told me he need to talk with the CTRSM before I could return to work.

On march 21, 1986 the FTQ refuse again to assist for that deposition at the CSST for a claim to be recognize admissible by the CSST, as seen in my denunciation/summon document page 14.

On March 25, 1986 Dr. Pelletier advised me that he change his mind, after he saw the CTRSM and the PAE Organization, and stated that I can't return to work.

On April 4,1986 at the demand of the CSST regarding my application I saw Dr. Gauthier general Practitioner at Charles Lemoyne Hospital. He doesn't understand why the CTRSM medically refused to let me work and that create my anxiety. Dr. Gauthier gave me on April 7, 1986 a temporary leave absence. With that, counsel by the CSST, I applied to the welfare and received some money for my family to survive.

On April 9,1986 I receive a letter from the CTRSM advising me I had a return to work from Dr. Pelletier on Mars 17, 1986.

On April 10, 1986 the CSST transferred the case to IVAC. I need to represent myself alone I still didn't have any representation after three years from the FTQ Union from three Presidents assisted by two legal advisor of Montreal FTQ Union head office.

On April 14, 1986 I receive a letter from the RCMP advised me they don't have the mandate to investigate this kind of case. They reconfirm what they told me on January 14, 1985 that I had to transfer my case to the Quebec Provincial and City Police who have this first responsibility.

On December 10, 1986 the FTQ Union didn't assist me in contesting the medical findings of the CTRSM at the IVAC. They said, "that doesn't concern them because they never started that case, you did that without our consent" so they said " it's my own responsibility".

On September 1987 the Lawyer Mr. Boulerice sent a certified letter to the FTQ Union compelling the FTQ Union to legally represent me against the CTRSM.

On September 11, 1987, as seen in my denunciation/summon document page 76 they confirm to the lawyer, they will do the necessary medical representation.

On September 15, 1987, as seen in my denunciation/summon document page 79 the first manipulation

By the CTRSM regarding the medical arbitration for the choice of the third doctor, as seen in my denunciation/summon document page 79,letter from the CTRSM.

On September 19, 1987 as seen in my denunciation/summon document page 80, the letter for the denial from Dr. Gauthier to accept the first choice of the third doctor.

On December 21, 1987 as seen in my denunciation/summon document pages 108 to 113, I wrote a letter for the FTQ Local CTRSM President Mr. Champagne and his FTQ Legal advisor Mr. Fernand Clericy. Because the FTQ refuse to do anything regarding this letter.

On December 21, 1987,after they read my letter, the President Mr. Champagne and his FTQ Union Legal advisor Mr. Fernand Clericy advise me. That I have no right to interfere with the decision of my own doctor and the CTRSM, we have already giving you this advice for the interference you made with the first choice of the expert Dr. Beliveau as the third doctor.

On February 1988, I transmit the letter I wrote on December 21, 1987 for the FTQ Local CTRSM at the President Mr. Champagne and his FTQ Legal advisor Mr. Fernand Clericy to the lawyer Mr. Pierre Armand Tremblay for advice. The lawyer Pierre Armand Tremblay took the mandate of representing me. He sent a certified letter no L20424789 on February 29, 1988 to the CTRSM for Mr. Andre Frechette Human Resource Department. He send also a cc to CTRSM Drivers Union which can be seen on pages 122, 123, 124 of same denunciation/summon document deposit in court.

The CTRSM never replied to the certified letter sent on February 29, 1988 by lawyer Pierre Armand Tremblay and the FTQ never communicate with him to explain there position. The case was closed when it was assumed by lawyer Pierre Armand Tremblay on may 9, 1988, the CTRSM accepted the denial of Dr. Brunet in this case because the CTRSM never contested the letter and the FTQ by her silence answer had admit my right.

On the April 9,1988, the CTRSM decided to file the first stage of the first grievance. The CTRSM local President Mr. Champagne advised me not to worry, I had answer on April 26, 1988 this grievance was unacceptable and out dated and should be rejected. These letters can be see on page 129,130 on in my denunciation/summon document.

*On the April 29,1988, Mr. Claude Poirier Radio Criminalist Speaker in a special occasion, planed a meeting the same week with Mr. Lahaye Criminal lawyer and his assistant. After four hours they said to me "how can you have this medical report and have no criminal record, it's unbelievable".

* They conclude for my own protection that I need to make a denunciation/summon document and file it with the court. It was their contention that: " if I didn't do that the Quebec Government would bring criminal charges against me because I am receiving a full mental disability pension fraudulently. Also if I accept the disability payments from Quebec this would indicate that you agree with this fraud situation, but if you file the denunciation/summon document in court the Quebec government would just file your document without any action against you ".

* Also: " the Quebec Government would not be able to cover up their criminal action by a mistake of the bureaucracy. And if I (Mr. Lahaye) take your case, the Quebec Government will use 40 lawyers against us. I will be a false musical note between a beautiful governmental harmony ".

* So I prepare the denunciation/summon document and gave it to the first justice of the Peace in Longueuil to be processed. He refused to do his job and told me he didn't want to be responsible for a Royal Commission Investigation and transferred the case to Mr. Patenaude the Longueuil Justice Court Prosecutor. Mr. Patenaude mandates the SQ Police at the Economic Fraud Department to make an investigation. That the second one Investigation he asked for: the first one at the Longueuil City Police who refuse to do it pretending it cost to much and this one which I never learn the result except one day he told me " He didn't know against who he need to make a criminal charge ".

On May 5, 1988, the CTRSM filed the second stage of the first grievance. Nobody from the FTQ Union had advice me and my lawyer of this progression.

On May 19, 1988, they obtained the lapsing request of my case no 500-05-016630-814 in Quebec Canadian Court as describe before on paragraph 28, part II.

On June 1, 1988, the CTRSM fired me.

On June 1988, the FTQ filed the second grievance.

* On spring 1989, Judge Dulude's proceed for 7 day in court between January and May 1989.

*On February 1989 Mr. Morin FTQ Lawyer hired Mr. Jean Tremblay psycologue as an expert for the second grievance.

*On February 6, 1989, February 13, 1989 and March 31, 1989 Mr. Jean Tremblay psycologue evaluated me by his test and a special written one witch he send to the University of Ohio Illinois. That one came back certifying my good mental health and even a superior I.Q.

* On December 9, 1989 was giving the 43 pages of the Judge Dulude's Judgement and advised in his Judgement page 24 last paragraph and 25 first and second paragraph: his judgement was applicable if the CTRSM win the first grievance.

* On May 16, 1990, Mr. Pierre Rochefort my Lawyer and I were still waiting for an audition for the CTRSM first grievance that was in its second stage. I filed suite at Longueuil small claims court, with the assistance of Mr. Pierre Rochefort my lawyer, for $927.50 which was withheld from my wages to pay doctor fees for which I wasn't responsible to pay and the CTRSM had no legal right to withhold that amount from my salary.

On February 2, 1991, the first hearing with Judge Verdy of the small claims court and his demand for a resume of the full story identified as a Presentment.

On May 13, 1991, we learned that Judge Dionne was assigned for the second hearing of the case.

On May 15, 1991, we learned Judge Simmon Brassard replace Judge Dionne and during the process of this case My lawyer and myself learned how the CTRSM criminally had drop the second grievance with two perjury cover up by the FTQ Union and accepted by the Judge Simon Brassard.

_______________________________________

1. Two perjuries in the Longueuil Small Claims City Court.

2. The First Perjury at the Longueuil Small Claim Court

3. At the time of the small claims court hearing, the CTRSM, they had already filed the entry form for the 1st stage and 2nd stage of 1st grievance. This was to confirm that Dr. Brunet of Medisys Health Group Inc. had a completely neutral opinion concerning the heath of myself, Serge Morel. This was not possible since Dr. Brunet had a contract with Medisys Health group Inc. and Medisys a private corporation is responsible to represent CTRSM not me.

4. This first grievance was to clarify the FTQ Unions opposition to the qualification of DR. Brunet as the 3rd Doctor as specified in the article 33.05 of the CTRSM employees contract, determine the validity of the second grievance and whether if I need to pay these fees.

5. The CTRSM misappropriated $ 929.50 from my last paycheck allegedly retrieving this amount in the name of the CSST. This deduction was written on my pay stub, the check was seized by the CTRSM. This can be verified by checking the denouncement document pages 116,117 and 118 deposited at both the Montreal Superior and Longueuil Small Claims Court and the Presentation Report deposited at the Longueuil Small Claims Court.

6. After a CSST investigation into this deduction, I was advised by the CSST that they never received the $927.50 from the CTRSM and I don't owe them anything. After consulting Mr. Rochefort I filed suite with his assistance in the Longueuil Small Claims Court on May 16,1990 case #505-32-001108-90-2. The first audience was on the 04/02/1991 room 1.31 with Judge Verdy.

7. A strange parade of Judges appeared at the Longueuil Small Claims Court for my case.

8. The Presentational Report was deposited to the court at the demand of Judge Verdy who heard the first audience on April 2, 1991 in room 1.31 that's when he ask me to do the document Presentational Report.

9. On May 13, 1991, I submitted the presentational report to Mr. Patenaude, Longueuil Prosecutor attached to the Longueuil City Justice Court office, and to Judge Verdy who demanded it. At this time I was told that Judge Dionne from Montreal would be the judge at the hearing on May 15, 1991. So I gave my presentational report to judge Dionne instead. At the hearing of May 15, 1991 judge Dionne was not in attendance but judge Simon Brassard in his place to hear my case #505-32-001108-90-2 in room 1.33.

10. The CTRSM told the court a computer prevented from deducting the $927.50. They claimed they didn't have a file to clarify the fact the money was to be used to pay my doctor for the fees per article 33.05 of the CTRSM employees contract I have this perjured testimonies on tape from the Longueuil Small Claim Court.

The Second Perjury at the Longueuil Small Claim Court.

1. The CTRSM committed perjuries in front of Judge Simon Brassard of Longueuil Small Claim Court case #505-32001108-90-2.

The CTRSM dropped the 1st grievance. They had made for the recognition of Dr. Brunet from Medisys as the third Doctor because under article 33.05 C.

Because they said, they won the 2nd grievance, the CTRSM advised the Judge Simon Brassard that the second grievance superceding the first was a normal process for the worker court. (This is not a normal procedure and the CTRSM know that when they made the statement, article 33.05 C states "If we have a conflict between the two doctors, any of the parties, can ask that the worker ministry to assign a 3rd doctor ")

2. Judge Dulude wrote in his judgement for the 2ND grievance made by the FTQ Union page 25 this:" the value of this judgement is directly dependent on the recognition of Dr. Brunet, in the first grievance, as the third doctor accepted by the F.T.Q. and the C.T.R.S.M.

Because of the delay by the CTRSM in the 3st stage inscription of the 1st grievance, the 2nd grievance, which was made on June 1988 by the FTQ Union because the CTRSM fired me, was schedule before the first grievance.

At the question I asked to the FTQ Union President Mr. Champagne why we need to proceed before the first one, Mr. Champagne told me, " we past the 2nd grievance hearing before because we save the time delay if we lose the 1st grievance.

3. The FTQ Union never contested any CTRSM testimony, at the small claims court and the FTQ local president Mr. Champagne, who joked with Denise Laplante the former CTRSM director, cover the fact that the new fees of Dr. Bruned, I had to paid had change, now they are at $ 927.50.

The CTRSM's invoice from Medisys stipulate two fees. The 1st fee for Dr. Beliveau was 77.50 however this doctor was not accepted as the third doctor and therefore I should not have to pay this fee.

The 2nd fee for Dr. Brunet was 850.00, which the CTRSM said they had already dropped this fee as specified in the 1st grievance. As can be seen in the denunciation/summon document Page 14, 115, 116, 117and 118.

Mr. Champagne start laughing in court when the Judge Simon Brassard advised the court: "This case must be referred to the worker ministry" (I have these testimonies on tape from the Longueuil Small Claim Court.). While sitting in the back of the audience Mr. Champagne said, "It's too late" and he later told me" you're not a CTRSM employee now and the FTQ Union doesn't need to represent you any longer".

4. The 1st grievance was made after the CTRSM and the FTQ Union received a certified letter on February 9, 1988 from Mr. Pierre Armanda Tremblay the attorney I hired to look investigate the matter of who contracted Dr. Brunet. Dr. Brunet was supposed to be a Doctor attached to the Sacre-Coeur Hospital of Montreal as Dr Pelletier said to Dr Gauthier for the choice of the third doctor.

5. The reason I hired the lawyer was because the day I past the exam at Dr. Brunet office I asked him if he would send his report to Dr. Gauthier and myself. He told me he was under contract with Medisys who was paying for the evaluation and he need to sent them his report.

6. He also told me: " I need to ask them if they want because it is their propriety and if they wanted I have no objection to sending a copy to you and Dr Gauthier".

7. Them I ask him if he was affiliated with Sacre-Coeur Hospital and he said " NO "

8. We can better understand now why the Judge Dulude's two allusions I submit below.

9. Page 28 of his judgement; last paragraph, the Judge find it strange how the arbitration of medical diagnosis of Doctor Brunet, Dr. Sioufy and DR. Goineau was oriented.

10. Page 38 of the judgement, the judge was disturbed by CTRSM's decision to fire me six months after Dr. Brunet diagnosis and conclusion of Dr. Pelletier, but less than 15 days after the judgement to reject my case in court.

12. There were five things, adding to the Dr. Pelletier perjury the Judge Dulude was unaware of, at the time of this second grievance case hearing.

13. A)-Dr Brunet and Dr. Pelletier were under contract with Medisys.

14. B)-The CTRSM has already seize the fees of Dr. Beliveau and Dr. Brunet by a misappropriate paycheck.

At the second grievance hearing the CTRSM wouldn't answer who paid Dr. Brunet's fees. The FTQ Union lawyer, Mr. Morin, did succeed in getting the CTRSM to admit that I never paid Dr. Brunet. The CTRSM also admitted that this is why they filed the first grievance on April19, 1988.

Mr. Morin also reported that the evaluation of Mr. Jean Tremblay psycologue who evaluated me with his test and a special written one which he sent to the University of Ohio Illinois. That one came back certifying my good mental health and also a superior I.Q.

The CTRSM prosecutor and Dr. Brunet Psychiatry denied the evaluation of these tests suggested in the report of Dr. Brunet, saying the psychiatry has a higher rank than the psycologue, the psycologue didn't have the competence to make a diagnosis of good health or mental disability and to be admitted at this court as an expert. They covered that by the fact, the Quebec Government health Ministry agreed with them.

You can compare the real value of the report of Dr. Brunet and Mr. Jean Tremblay by how they make their evaluation. Dr. Brunet evaluates me in one appointment of one 1hours 30 minutes and the reading of the first document (Elaboration and testimony of Mr.Morel Surrounding the Elaboration of CDRIL Project and related to Criminal Actions) and the second document identified it (Report Given to IVAC).

Mrs. Lucie Rouleau of IVAC asked the first document. She asked me to describe all the events for whom ever near or far that could be related by which events linked or a dought that could be related to the case. She also advised me that I should not worry about this being proved necessary. Which would also help guide the investigator through all the details.

The second was written by two lawyer base one the first document and deposit at the IVAC to complete my case.

Dr. Brunet read them in 4 hours, talk by phone with three Doctor in 1 hours and then saw me for 90 minutes and diagnosis I was fully mentally disabled.

Mr. Jean Tremblay psycologue saw me 3 hours in office at the first appointment. The second appointment of 1:30 hours I past three test the Roaschach, the MMPI, and the Medts. The third appointment of 1:30 hours and I past the test Barbeau-Pinard and the fourth appointment I past a test which he told me it's to be evaluated at the University of Ohio Illinois USA. After that he took 6 to 7 hours to study all the documents of this case.

His diagnosis was I have good mental health and even a superior I.Q.

The same documents studies by these two doctor had served also for the debate of 7 days in the second grievance by the FTQ Union lawyer because he recognize the document as a legal document made by Mr. Gerard Gay, lawyer and Mr. Raymond Labelle, lawyer, certified by a copyright file no 276454 and copyright file no 276455 dated both September 18,1987.

15. C)-In spring 1989 the CTRSM had written a misappropriate check on June 29, 1988. They falsely labeled the reason for the check on the check stub and combined two fees, the one of Dr. Beliveau and the second for Dr. Brunet. So by this criminal action the CTRSM administrator wouldn't have questions to answer publicly concerning the amount they paid for Medisys and didn't have to explain the conflict in this case.

16. Confirmation of this fact is found at the Longueuil Small Claim Court case #505-32001108-90-2. The CTRSM said to Judge Simon Brassard that is not a misappropriate check, just a failing of their computer protocol.

17. D)-Dr Brunet, Dr. Sioufy and Dr. Pelletier were under contract with Medisys.

18. E)-The last one Judge Dulude was unaware of, at the time of this second grievance case hearing was: the

Medisys doctors working for the Quebec Government was the only ones concluding publicly the diagnosis of full mental disability.

19. By the contract Medisys had with the CTRSM and all branches of the Quebec Government to representing them as the governmental medical office an expert used to contest medical reports in legal proceeding. Because of this, all Medisys contract's doctors didn't had the independent status by the conflict of interests.

20. Dr. Gauthier refuse to accept the " independent " status accreted to Dr. Beliveau who was the 1st Medisys psychiatrist chose by the CTRSM alone on August 25,1987 and rejected by the FTQ because it's not the choice of the two doctor. Dr. Beliveau was chosen a second time on September 21, 1987 but was rejected by Dr. Gauthier on September 19, 1987. Dr. Pelletier never told him that Dr. Beliveau was the first CTRSM choice and was rejected by the FTQ and Dr. Beliveau wasn't independent of the CTRSM.

21. When Dr. Gauthier asked Dr. Pelletier about Dr. Brunet's relationship with the CTRSM he was told Dr. Brunet was completely independent and attached to Sacre-Coeur Hospital.

22. As seen in my denunciation/summon document on pages 122, 123, 124 of the dilation document, the CTRSM never replied to the certified letter sent on may 9, 1988 by lawyer Pierre Armand Tremblay. The case was closed when it was assumed the CTRSM accepted the denial of Dr. Brunet in this case because the CTRSM never contested the letter. That's the first reject of Dr. Brunet.

The second one was made by the FTQ contested the first grievance for two reason give by the president Mr. Champagne, this grievance was unacceptable and out dated and should be rejected and third one the CTRSM personally when they advise the Judge Brassard they had already drop the first grievance

23. Page 38, paragraph 4, Judge Dulude said; " with what he has known, he doesn't have enough evidence to prove dishonesty or manipulation against someone". The Judge didn't know about the F.T.Q. Union lawyer Mr. Morin and the CTRSM prosecutor covering up Dr. Pelletier's perjury and the five things describe above.

24. The first grievance was the only response the CTRSM had about the letter from my lawyer rejecting the fees of the third doctor. This first grievance was made to force me to pay 50% of the third doctor's fee in order that they would look publicly correct. The FTQ Union would cover up the fact that Dr. Brunet was not the third doctor chosen by the two other doctors in accordance to article 33.05, and denied the 1st grievance against me and the 2nd grievance was made by the FTQ to contest the CTRSM who fired me with two false reason.

This was also my only grievance in my 11 years of employment. The amazing thing is that the CTRSM signed 1st grievance against me, thereby covering all their criminal tracks with the assistance of the FTQ Union.

25. You can now see the first grievance was abnormal because it was not initiated by the FTQ Union but by the CTRSM. The same CTRSM who refused to answer the objection letter. The same CTRSM who later collude with the FTQ Union. It's the same CTRSM who advise the Judge Simon Brassard they had drop the 1st grievance

26. It's the same CTRSM who seized the $927.50 " to paid Dr. Brunet fees ", as they say "because the judgement was in their favor "but the judgement came up 18 months later.

27. The FTQ by their silent inaction, gave tacit approval to deny me due process and allow to CTRSM the right to do this because as they say's they won the second grievance.

28. And the Judge, Simon Brassard, by his judgment cover the CTRSM and FTQ perjury by overlook voluntary in his judgment the fact of 18 months delay who prove without any doubt these three criminal action:

29. The misappropriate check, on June 29,1988 and the two reason given to covert this: they won the judgment of December 4,1989 and the last one, they dropped the first grievance because the second grievance superceding the first was a normal process for the court of arbitration.

30. Did by the Canadian rule of the law, the Judge needed to accept as a good reason, a premonition of the person who think a judgment will be in your favor months and years before the judgment is deliver to commit criminal act.

31. By the Canadian Law it's legal to withdraw illegally some money and made a perjury in court of arbitration.

32. By the Canadian law like also it's legal to make a second public perjury in a small claim court and get away with it.

33. I don't think it's true, It's like the Judge Simon Brassard made a criminal cover up by missing out voluntarily with all the knowledge he had of their criminal act and their perjury. And, use them voluntarily to give his Judgment.

34. This gave two reasons why for this case in the Longueuil small Court you had this parade of the Judge describe below and involving the Judge Verdy, Judge Dionne and Judge Simon Brassard j.c.q.

35. 1-) The Perjury of the CTRSM by the reason they give under oath to the court and,

36. 2-) The FTQ association in this crime by their silent in non-objection in court. (I have these testimonies on tape from the Longueuil Small Claim Court and the Judge Simon Brassard written Judgment.)

37. For a better understanding of the implication of the Medisys center inc. concerning the medical representation contract with the C.T.R.S.M., Medisys have also by the Quebec Government the mandate to represent them for the medical office and for any medical objections for:

38. The C.S.S.T. who transferred my case to IVAC a branch of the C.S.S.T.

39. The I.V.A.C. who retransfer my case to the C.T.R.S.M. Medical office Medisys. The C.S.S.T and I.V.A.C. have the same medical corporation Medisys to represent them.

40. On may 16,1991 the Quebec Pension Plan gave me a letter for US Immigration confirming the disability pension? In august 14, 1991, they denied that disability declare by their own doctor directly associate by contract with Medisys and didn't pay the pension for one year. I had one year to contest the decision.

41. I wait almost the whole year after their decision, to see if they would claim the previous pay pension. Nothing was done, so I send to Quebec Disability Pension plan a document and a medical report of good health from my family doctor.

42. That document was to advised the Quebec Disability Pension plan they are right. I'm not sick and it should be transferred to the Crime Victims Assistance Bureau (IVAC) branch of the CSST.

43. Four day later I call them if the had received my document. They confirmed and said; " my back pension check was made. I called my lawyer telling him that.

44. He calls them to understand what's going on and sent to him why I receive this pension.

45. My lawyer told me: they said he needs to accept the money and he will never receive letter.

46. My lawyer, MR. Pierre Rochefort, reported me, " they just did another criminal act against you.

47. The event from how I obtain the criminal proof against the RRQ was:

The rente of Quebec who give a letter written in English on May 16, 1991 cut the pension in July or

August 1991. I'm waiting on August 14, 1992 to make a statement and contesting to the medical report of full mental disability and a request for the 90% of my salary what is supposed to be covert by my personal insurance I pay to the governmental organization IVAC.

48. This document was written also for the S.S.O. Mutual insurance and the Rente of Quebec. The Rente of Quebec who after they received the document sent me my back pension to my lawyer but refused to tell him why they pay this pension but sent later a letter to my mortgage company and to the lawyer who took the case of the USA claim for a car accident where I received a full disabled pension and because of this situation which maintains me in low income and the inability of any disabled damage because I already have this full disable pension I need to make an early settlement of this U.S. car accident.

49. The Canadian Government and the Quebec Government there two Justice Department have advised the Rente of Quebec for my disability pension, they don't want to tell the reason why they pay me this pension. Did they have made an investigation? By the E-mail of the Minister of Quebec Justice secretary that just confirms what Mr. Rochefort told me, they just put my life on back of the drawer and they don't want to take care of what they had done.

50. The Quebec Medical Insurance who refuse to make this extension who was in Fact the continuation of what they had already given from August 1,1991 to August 1,1992 to cover certain hospital and medical expenses that me and my family would be insured. At this date almost six years later I never received any letters from them.

51. The S.S.Q. my private Insurance, endorse the choice of the Medisys center corporation, pay the other parts of this criminal full disability pension and sent to the USA these criminal medical information. The S.S.Q. never ask for any investigation and they had all the knowledge of this criminal situation, but also they are directly related by contract with the Quebec Government involve in this criminal medical cover-up. That's why we can understand. They don't want to loose their very lucrative contract.

52. The Medisys Corporation, by contract represent all branches of the Quebec Government as the governmental medical office experts for legal testimony. Their doctors are the only people who had commented on their medical report details concerning the CDRIL (pseudo) project I did for the C.T.R.S.M.

53. In PART –III Act three at the Longueuil Small Claims City Court (Note). I have described above some events and references for which you can see who endorsed the project politically, financially, and professionally. Three provinces and now three countries were involved about this system using a copy of my conception. The CTRSM medical office Medisys, the doctors, evaluated this conception and psychiatric of Medisys center, the lawyer of C.T.R.S.M endorsed by the FTQ Union as a pseudo project and a dream in my head. The CTRSM lawyer plead in Montreal Superior Court the depot of the document was never deposit to the court and the project never existed.

54. The Longueuil City Police, the (Quebec Provincial Police) Surety of Quebec reporting to the Public Security Minister, who is affiliated with the Quebec Minister of Justice and the Quebec Provincial Prosecutor. Three branches of the Federal Security Police who are Royal Canadian Gendarmerie (GRC), Royal Canadian Mountain Police (RCMP), and the Canadian Institute Secret Service (CISS) The Quebec and Canadian ministry of Justice made the cover up of all these criminals actions.

Respectfully,

Serge Morel

June 24,1998