Quebec Pension Found (RRQ
This document is a part of my statement and contesting report
to the Quebec Pension Found in reference to the financial decision
of my full mental disability pension.
In good faith, I can ascertain that I have never been disabled and it
is the S.T.R.S.M. (Société de Transport de la Rive Sud de
Montréal) who,
from its head office stopped me from working, through Dr. Pelletier who
endorsed this cessation of work during all these years by tampering with
the medical files at the request of the Corporation Group
Santé Médisys
According to the situation that was supposed to have been established
at the administration of Quebec Pension Plan it is a request to be reimbursed
by the S.T.R.S.M. following the criminal inquiry and the subsequent medical
schemes of someone at the head of the pension plan of Quebec. This person
endorsed this demand three days after it was officially lodged in Montreal.
The RRQ officials in Montreal were fully aware of this nonsense. They
even asked me why a man who possessed a bus driver's permit of class 1,
2, 3, 4, 4B and a clean bill of health could be declared a total invalid.
I was asked why I had an arbitration judgment of total disability. It is
really distressing that after having been asked these questions, the Pension
Plan of Quebec should have covered up their illegal, even criminal acts
by simply endorsing a medical report that was dated two years before, and
that was made by a doctor employed by the Corporation of Group
Santé Médisys.
The Corporation is, at the same time, the corporation that controls the
Administration of Quebec Pension Plan and their medical disputes Médisys,
was, and still is the medical representation of the Pension Plan bureau
for their medical evaluations. The S.T.R.S.M. did not even bother to contest
the veracity of the allusions I made concerning the integrity of said organization that nonetheless controls all the medical reports
of the Pension Plan bureau.
Page 1
Page (2)
What I find inconceivable is that all the benefits that I was supposed
to have received were cancelled. This is because one of their doctors,
a so-called "expert", declared, during the second grievance hearing that
I was totally disabled. This Corporation Group Santé Médisys, after having
accepted the final judgment of the adjudicator Dr. Guy E. Dulude, declared
on December 4th, 1989 the first hearing void. The Corporation Group
Santé Médisysdid in fact produce a totally new medical evaluation that would
cover their illegal actions in spite of their conflicting situation and
obstruction of the law.
This Corporation Group Santé Médisys had to judge, I repeat, "judge"
the previous medical reports. This, then was a formal and specific declaration
of an employee's total disability ordered by the S.T.R.S.M..
The employer was the Transport Commission of Quebec that has now become
a Society fully integrated with the Government of Quebec. It is a well
know fact that the Government either grants, directly or indirectly, contracts
that run in the billions of dollars.
The following statements that I am giving will help you understand better
what occurred. In addition, allow me to add the introduction given to the
Quebec Health Insurance Plan (Assurance Maladie du Quebec).
The QUEBEC HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN
Quebec Health Insurance Plan (Assurance Maladie du Québec)
To whom it may concern:
This extension is, in fact but the continuation of what you have already
given to my family, from August 1, 1991 to August 1, 1992 to cover certain
hospital and medical expenses that my family and I would incur. Monique,
my wife helps me by taking care of my children's (Ludovyck, Jésabelle and
Raphael) schooling. My daughter Karyne, who attain one's majority, still
resident student in Quebec.
Page 2
Page (3)
I believe that it is the legitimate obligation of the Government of
Quebec to cover all medical expenses that might be incurred during this
involuntary and forced exile brought about by the Government's actions,
that I should insist, are "criminal". In the next pages, I will explain
as briefly as possible the afore-mentioned events and the introduction
given out to the Quebec Pension fund (Régie des Rentes du
Québec RRQ).
The Short RRQ (French 21 pages Report in 9
pages)
The G.R.C. recommended this political exile when I met with them at
a meeting that I have mentioned and declared under oath at the Longueuil
law-court (court du Palais de Justice de Longueuil). The documents were
submitted, together with the denouncement that unveils certain illegal
actions taken by two important people who were directly implicated. These
two men are:
1. Maitre Pierre Marc Johnson,
who is both a lawyer and a doctor and who holds the position of Minister
of Corporations and Finance, Justice and Quebec Prime Minister.
2. M. Parent retired minister nominated by
M. Pierre Marc Johnson without being rightfully elected.
Furthermore the Pension Plan of Quebec who, during two years paid all
the expenses of a total disability and this without any other medical examination
that the one given by Dr. Brunet of the Corporation Group
Santé Médisys.
Moreover, that was dated two years before this time.
After invalidating the first grievance hearing that they had petitioned
themselves and after my refusal to pay the fees of their doctor, the S.T.R.S.M.,
through an official letter by my private lawyer.
The RRQ in any case…"realized"… that the situation was preposterous
and had been manipulated by Dr. Brunet of the Corporation Group
Santé Médisys.
Moreover the officials of the Pension Plan of Quebec were advised of
this situation by myself and were invited to attend the court-hearing debate
concerning the validity of Dr. Brunet's feed claim by the STRSM. The Brunet
medical report requests and sent as propriety of the S.T.R.S.M. which
had request it under his contract with Médisys the personnel medical
office of the S.T.R.S.M.. This court-hearing suppose to debate the allegation
S.T.R.S.M. feed claim they had under a falsification identification criminally
seize when they fired me on my final paycheck.
Page 3
Page (4)
Note
Note had understood some French written information not translated in
the original "August 14 1992 letter".
This discharge was the only grief made by the FTQ and has and STRSM
employee. The other one identified as first one was made by the STRSM who
had decline to contest in superior court the validity of the brunet claim
feed by them.
Their grief, as written by S. Champagne, was presented out of the permit
delay but the first and second of the three stage was proceed by the worker
ministry.
The STRSM advise the audience they had seize in June 1988 one years
and 6 month before because they wind the only grief the FTQ had made and
who had past before their whom grief? The judge Dulude judgment register
by the only FTQ grief made for me was given in December 4, 1989.
At this small claim court a musical chair was install for the Judges.
1-At the first hearing, the Judge asks me to do a brief of the case
and report the hearing.
2- When I deposit the brief, identified in my document as the "Presententiel
Report" I was advice and other judge was assigned on my case.
3-At the second hearing court schedule by the first Judge I learn that
a third judge was assigned to replace the first and second one?
This judge transferred the case to the Worker ministry where the Montreal
representing was obfuscated because as she told me she can believe I permitted
myself to go so far on my claim. She gave the advised to didn't call here
she will call me. I never hear anything from this ministry before this
August 14, 1992 RRQ document was written and sent to the Quebec prime Bourassa
who transferred it to Bourbeau criminally involve in this case has the
former 1980 STRSM mayors president. Bourbeau transfer the case to the RRQ
to study the criminal document case they had already received as identified
in the document. The RRQ had at that time, already reinstall the criminal
pension without written the reason on what the RRQ had base his new decision.
This decision was made only 4 day they had received it in august and had
made in this 4 day the year backup payment pension. This pension they had
sent at my request because of my exile, to my lawyer who, when I call him
after, can believe it and don't understand why? My lawyers ask me the name
of the person I talk and his telephone number and call him. He report me
later they toll him that:
"I was locked to have the money but don't hope to have any written
explication letter from them" he advise me also that and other criminal
act against me.
Now by this event description around this Report Letter you will understand
better the RRQ reaction of this original letter, which I follow here:
Page (4)SUITE
However, I'm not sure that the Regis attended the hearings but I know
they accepted to postpone the interview with Dr. Pierre Laberge that had
been scheduled two years before. The RRQ also warned me that my refusal
would cause my pay to be stopped. It should be noted here that the Pension
Plan of Quebec had already sent a letter in English to the U.S. Dept of
Immigration guaranteeing that I would receive my invalid pay until age
65. This led me to petition for status of political exile to the United
States to whom I had informed my predicament of not having received any
money at all from the Pension Plan of Quebec.
It is only because of this that the U.S. government gave me the necessary
financial aid to attend school and to obtain food stamps for my family
and me during the first six months in this country. I can't begin to show
my appreciation to the United States government, who acted so generously
without being constrained or under any obligation. Moreover, t have always
received moral support from all those we met in our daily lives.
I add here that I did pass the required medical examination on July
9, 1991 that enabled me to immigrate to the U.S.. An exam that Dr. Pierre
Laberge had given me but little did I know then that he worked for the
Corporation Group Santé Médisys.
Dr. Pierre Laberge, thus attached with the Corporation who had been
implicated in the tampering of my files, allowed the Corporation to handle
once more the medical report concerning my "invalid state" for the Pension
Plan of Quebec. I will now give the details referring to my medical file:
1. The Corporation Group Sauté Médisys represents the medical bureau
of the S.T.R.M..
2. It also represents, by choosing a doctor that became the final arbiter
in a union dispute, an
organization that serves 100,000 workers.
Page 4
Page (5)
3. It represents the bureau of medical arbitration of the C.S.S.T. that
was also implicated when my file was tampered with. In the report that
the judge asked for and that was presented under oath, I give a detailed
account of the deceit and the astounding interpretations of said report
by the C.S.S.T. allegations that simply try to cover up Dr. Siouffi erroneous
allegations. Furthermore, I gave a tape recording to Mr. Patenaude the
prosecutor of Longueuil. I made this tape to protect myself because it
records clearly the voice of the C.S.S.T. lawyer when she states that she
would have had less trouble if I had received a bullet in my head.
4. It represents the medical bureau of the Pension Plan of Quebec for
every one of the medical evaluations and disputes.
5. It represents the principal
medical bureau for medical insurance in Quebec.
Following the aforesaid about the Corporation Group Santé Médisys
that have in their employ more than 400 doctors, I will only deal with
those doctors who had direct dealings with my case:
1. Dr. Pelletier - He confessed to having changed his medical report
of "perfect health" after the specific request of the S.T.R.S.M.. Furthermore,
I will show you that he perjured himself and outraged the arbitration tribunal.
Pelletier who was under Médisys contract and represented the Medical office
of the human resources S.T.R.S.M. director responsible of the STRSM Public
Relation
2. Dr. Siouffi - He was also employed by the Corporation Group Santé
Médisys and produced a medical report request also by the S.T.R.S.M. and had any chance to learn more on his work from him. I fallow some
information you will understand why.
The Dr. Siouffi medical expertise dated on June 11 was changed between
this dated and Dr. Pelletier medical appointment. Pelletier had scheduled
this medical STRSM appointment at Montreal Médisys' Office on July 4.
I succeed to have the Siouffi medical evaluation by advising Pelletier
whom refused my request to have it. Pelletier told he can gave it, he need
to gave me and appointment to and other Doctor at the St. Jean sur Richelieu
Hospital. Pelletier advise that, by the urgency of my case he already took
and appointment for me to a Specialist.
I advise him if I can call my lawyer because he waited my call at his
office if I didn't succeed to have my medical report to show him.
This process was prepare after the St-John lawyer Boulerice had made
me aware of my rights to obtain such report and, can't explain why Pelletier
had schedule this appointment on a Friday 3 PM. Fourth of July. This strange
appointment was not at the STRSM medical office but in Montreal Médisys
office, which I had never, need to meet him there.
Page 5
Page (6)
Dr. Pelletier on this statement agree and after photocopying the report,
handed it and attach a prescription on with he had written the psychiatrist
Dr. Massicotte of St. Jean sur Richelieu Hospital. When I left his office,
he told me, that it wasn't him who do that but somebody else who put some
spoke in his wheels.
Strangely, this psychiatric evaluation report of Dr. Siouffi were it's
written some annotations over passing a employer evaluation request, which
the employer was the STRSM. Siouffi knowing this evaluation was not a request
from my personal practitioner but a contest to Dr. Corioland psychiatrist
of St. Jean sur Richelieu Hospital who had rejected the Dr. Pelletier was
intriguing. On his report was written a recommendation treatment an the
way that by the court they can obtain his application if I refuse it. This
could explain the reason why Pelletier refuses to give it.
Pelletier or somebody else, had took an appointment in the same hospital
were the psychiatrist had statue on my good mental health and for what
this new evaluation was request by the CTRSM. But, has Pelletier testified
in court he didn't know the Dr. Massicotte he had identified, as a psychiatric,
was in realty a Medical general practitioner who had a specialty on the
medical psychiatric treatment application
On the Siouffi evaluation requested by his employer Médisys under contract
with the CTRSM was written a recommended treatment using narcoleptics (neuroleptiques)
injections of lithium carbonate. On the same Siouffi evaluation was written
also the advice: if I refused to be hospitalized they could oblige me,
by his report, to get the treatment by a court order.
This was the big question I will appreciate he had answer why he had
written that.
Dr. Siouffi was to be the next witness after Dr. Pelletier in the grievance
court hearing.
He could have told us why he overpasses his employer evaluation
request or who was not implicated and those actions. But for what he was
held responsible for…the doctor was never be able to testified he died
10 day before his audition in the grievance court hearing.
Dr. Siouffi died at the 32 years old from no apparent cause. Draw your
own conclusions! I would like to stress the fact that Dr. Pelletier and
his private corporation, Group Santé Médisys, show by their
actions no respect for the laws and regulations of the Professional Corps
of Doctors in Quebec. They have acted illegally towards the Canadian and
Quebec justice department and have tampered with medical files.
Dr. Siouffi who was to be the next witness after Dr. Pelletier
and who could have told us why he was not consulted in those actions that
he was held responsible for. And Dr. Pelletier was just one part of this
action planned. And they had planning a very short time to stop any action
- 3:00 p.m. on Friday Fourth of July and the Monday morning on the seven
of July.
I would like to add here that Dr. Pelletier and the director of Human
Relations of the S.T.R.S.M. acted directly under the orders of the president
of the S.T.R.S.M.. They were also all under the direction of M. Jean Guy
Parent who is Commissioner and President of the Council of Mayors. M. Pierre
Marc Johnson later declared parent Minister (without being elect).
Johnson was fully aware of the project C.D.R.I.L.
.
In addition, Johnson knew the study of H.E.C. in Montreal which stated:
" the CDRIL project could earn, after a lapse of ten years, more than 600,000,000
dollars per year. This project CDRIL was supervised by: Mr.' Ronald Blake
the director of I.A.T.A. in Montreal; Mr. Fafard, the former president
and the former directors, Mr. Gilles Roy, Denis Tremblay of the S.T.R.S.M.
and also; Mr. DAVID M. SKELTON a former investment director of the Bahamas
Bank.
Page 6
Page (7)
Dr. Pelletier, after having changed my bill of good health to one of
sickness at the request of the S.T.R.S.M., stated later, to protect himself,
that he had so acted with the full support of the P.A.E..
Their testimonies could be see by clicking on her names
It was however but perjury and outrage to the court of arbitration.
This was confirmed later by the S.T.R.S.M. when they decided to erase everything
concerning the P.A.E. and Dr. Pelletier's plea. This was done with the
F.T.Q. local office of St. Hubert. In spite of these rejected demands,
the arbiter Mr. Guy E. Dulude never found out why the plea was retracted.
The F.T.Q. union and C S.T.R.S.M lawyers had come to an agreement out
of court without discussion or consulting my ones lawyer assisting the
court hearing or myself. These two lawyers admitted the objections put
forward by the President of the P.A.E. (Aid and Employee Program) and the
lye of Dr. Pelletier in court.
That I had never been on file with them and therefore could not be
involved. The two P.A.E. Presidents Mrs. Robert Boutin and Yvon Fontaine
had refused to be implicating in these CTRSM medical office manipulations
with the former president local 3333 Mr. Claude Boivert.
I would like to add here that the president of the FTQ union had been
notified of all this in the month of January. When I met the president
of P.A.E., purely by accident in May, 1989, I was never informing either
their owned layer and mine of all this during these five day hearing court
in the past two month. I was schedule to be in the witness box for the
day six and after on the seven day of hearing was the lawyers address court.
I told my private lawyer of these circumstances, who immediately spoke
to the union's lawyer who had not been notified of these events.
It is therefore clear that the F.T.Q., local 3333 ST
Hubert, Union was
also implicate in this medical, legal and syndicate obstruction. In my
declaration I have also described how this FTQ union was involved with
the government when they created the "Fond de Solidarité" which
was financially supported by the federal and the Quebec provincial government.
The "Fond de Solidarité" is a replica part of the
C.D.R.I.L.. international
found project.
Page 7
Page (8)
3. Dr. Béliveau - He is the doctor that I refused to meet, following
the advice of my private doctor. The FTQ and the CTRSM after an argument
agree to satisfy Doctor Dr. Gauthier my private Doctor.
Dr. Béliveau was also a doctor employed by the Group Santé
Médisys that Dr. Pelletier had strongly urged twice to meet with.
The S.T.R.S.M. charged me for the expenses and without telling, me deducted
them from my final check as employee. They did this by falsifying the documents
and charging his fees together with those of Dr. Brunet {under the article
# 39 "Reimbursement to the C.S.S.T. (Commission Santé Sécûrité
au Travail) " Translation (Health and Security Worker Commission).
4. Dr. Brunet - He is the doctor who I refused to pay through a letter
by my private lawyer. Instead of answering at the legal protest, the C.T.R.S.M.
started a grievance to oblige my payment and to acknowledge Dr. Béliveau
as a third doctor and thus the arbitrator and judge of my medical file.
This was the first at the CTRSM were the employer file like as and employee.
Also that the first Grief after the Boulerice letter forcing them to represent
myself, the FTQ accepted to plied for me. I was a employee at the CTRSM
since 1977 an I never made a Grief and my employee file was any reproach
except two absences one related with a work accident an the others initiated
by the CTRSM in 1985.
This doctor was also under contract with the Corporation Group
Santé Médisys. I won the case by default against the S.T.R.S.M. at the court
of small claims for the reimbursement of the $970.00 that were seized shamelessly,
illegally and fraudulently by the S.T.R.S.M.. The latter pleaded that the
first grievance had been abandoned in favor of the second one, because
they said it encompassed everything. I actually recorded this perjury on
a tape.
I describe further on the defense that was
made against the allegations of Guy E. Dulude who was the arbitrator.
The medical report of Dr. Brunet was and is of great importance because it
annuls the judgment of the second hearing that came after the first hearing
. Page 8
Page (9)
This made the S.T.R.S.M. responsible, together with the Corporation
Group Santé Médisys, for the loss of my salaries and privileges and the
incurring damages.
The fact that my salary at that time, September 7, 1984 to September
7, 1985 was on an average of $1000.~ per week, I was sustaining a loss
of $900.00, or, about 90% of my salary. This should have been given to
me by the I.V.A.C. (Administration for the Victims of Criminal Acts) since
1985.
It is to be noted here that I.V.A.C. is also part of the government
network that utilizes the Corporation Group Santé Médisys for all medical evaluations
and litigation of the I.V.A.C. (C.S.S.T.) and CTRSM!!!
New Information had to the English
original Document
Page (9) SUITE
There is no doubt that the government and its different organizations
have no confidence in the public medical system of Quebec and their hospitals.
One wonders who received directly or indirectly the billions of dollars
that government Dr. Quebec Medical Association and the Government Dr. Expert receive and yet seem untouchable.
5. Doctor Pierre Laberge - He is an expert in the Quebec Pension Funds.
What is disturbing about him is that he is supposed to be Chief Medical
doctor of the Bureau Régie des Rente du Québec(Québec Pension
Funds) but signs at the bottom of the report "Member of the Society of
Expert Doctors of Quebec. He never once states that he is employed by the
Corporation Group Santé Médisys Inc., so subsequently must be aware of
all the antecedents and implications of this private company. He therefore
knew all about the perjury and the judgment and said here, and I repeat his words,
'the raving beliefs of my statements.'
I don't understand why they didn't produce a book that tells about their
dictatorial laws--judging by their actions this would serve as a
Bible and an integral part of this dictatorship that has brought to a stand-still
the legislation in Quebec, and the justice and liberty of the Press.
Page 9
Page (10)
They seem to get their funds by masking administration errors (???) in high
positions.
To back this allegation up I cite the example of the lost funds from
the pension plan of the laborers of Quebec.
These losses, according to the Montreal newspapers in March 1992 were
calculate at $100,000,000 per year. The losses', according to the Montreal
newspapers was incurred by errors of management.
According to the Municipal Bulletin of Greenfield Park, of January 1988,
the sum of $20,000 was registered for the purchase of mechanical spare
parts, but were in fact spent to purchase nuts, bolts and joints for the
fleet of 200 vehicles that were serviced outside of the S.T.R.S.M.. These
and other crazy deals could fill volumes.
In my other documents I mention many other deals, such as falsified
insurance claims, lost checks for $80,000 in the S.T.R.S.M. and the offer
of $135,000 that was made to me. According to P. D. Girard, who was in
1992 mayor of St. Hubert would have (in November 1983), been skimmed from S.T.R.S.M. funds
without anyone being the wiser.
I realize by all that happened that here was reason to believe that
M. Parent, Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson and other people would have endorsed
the purchase of my silence.
They most certainly must have been bitterly disappointed by my refusal.
The proof of this offer has been sworn to before the court and the Bureau
Du Syndic De Quebec (Quebec Syndic office) handed this written proof to
me. I must add that it is deplorable that the private corporation of the
Group Santé Médisys works within the medical system of Quebec with no
less than 400 doctors. I hope that not all these doctors show this criminal
deformity and act purely and illegally for their personal and political
ends.
Moreover, this corporation enjoys an almost untouchable status in regards
to its medical, political and legal importance. Mr. Pierre Marc Johnson's
career spans all three as he is a doctor and a lawyer by profession, and
has been Minister of: Industry and Corporation; Finances; Justice and Prime
Minister of Quebec.
Page 10
Page (11)
Continuing the explanations that put in the picture, I will now describe
to you the situation that prevailed when my medical files were tampered
with. These events happened after I had filed a complaint against the S.T.R.S.M.,
the Corporation Group Santé Médisys and the local chapter of the F.T.Q. (that
acts under the F.T.Q. of Montreal). Following this complaint, the S.T.R.S.M.
made me appear 48 times at court to defend myself. The lawyer Cimone who
is the friend of Jean Guy Parent represented the S.T.R.S.M.. They were
implicated with M. Pierre D. Girard in the afore mentioned offer of $135,000.
The legal bureau commissioned two lawyers to represent Cimone himself who
by their action incriminate Cimone in the manipulation and disappearance
of the court case file. They were miraculously "found" by one of Cimone
lawyer Germain and handed over to the director of the court, but the court
were never see them and nobody said were they had disappear again.
Mr. Fafard, past president of the S.T.R.S.M. thanked Jean Guy Parent
by compensating him with $65,000 and cautioning him not to make any commentary
to the information media concerning the S.T.R.S.M..
Further hearings were postponed, as my file had not reappeared. Finally,
another lawyer of the S.T.R.S.M. told their legal bureau that the file
had never existed, and could not exist neither in the high court nor in
the courts of appeal in Quebec.
At this CTRSM lapsing request hearing, my personal representation right
was denied. The spite of my difficult situation and lack of honesty of
the S.T.R.S.M. and the Group Santé Médisys (who had both declared
me a total invalid). When explaining the court case deposit files was missing
the CTRSM Cimone replacing lawyer plied " I was medically mental disable
and the files I talk had only existed in my head. The judge never let me
talk after and let the right of speech only at the CTRSM lawyer .
After she clause the Case. She accepted one question, which was if she
permit the deposition of the file legalized by Pierre D. Girard, photocopy
I had in my possession. This request was accepted with indifference for
her. The ombudsman of the court was advise of this bizarre judge comportment
an researched the case and found the original file in a box. All these
events were reports to the police and the courts of Quebec.
Page 11
Page (12)
The S.T.R.S.M. had the all to bill me $17,000 to cover the cost of their
legal fees. To obtain this money that they had justified in the law courts,
they seized my house the very day that I was closing the sale of it. The
sale obviously couldn't go through and the sale of the house was taken
over by the Sheriff. Thanks to the intervention of my personal lawyer,
this was never accomplished, as he put down the money for me thirty
minutes before the closure of the deal.
I will stop here, as all the details showing the bureau's implications
in this matter can be found in the documents that I have filed with the
court and other legal authorities. No criminal charge has been filed against
that bureau that was representing the S.T.R.S.M.. According to the law
in Quebec, only the Crown attorney general can file these complaints, as
a government agency cannot be criminal. However, the Ministers of Justice
in Quebec can make these charges and follow up on suspect individuals.
This did not happen in fact, Pierre Marc Johnson, being Prime Minister
and having been aware of everything that Jean Guy Parent had done, nominated
him Cabinet Minister in his cabinet without elections.
I hope that the Quebec Pension Found RRQ will reimburse me all I have
coming to date; will transfer my file from the criminal courts to the Ministry
of Justice in Quebec and to the Quebec Prime Minister Mr. Bourassa.
I also hope that the Health Quebec Insurance plan (Assurance Maladie du Québec) will accept
my plea for and extension and show
some integrity, by presenting my file to the Quebec Justice Minister,
and saw to gets it Personally to the Québec Prime Minister Bourassa.
Serge Morel
August, 1992
Page 12
S.S.Q. MUTUEL D'ASSURANCE – GROUPE
This part I can translated this by myself because this
letter will deposit in a US court in my Accident claim court case that
why I only give the French translation to identified it, but was include also
with this French part of the:
French 21 pages translated and resume in English by a British English
translator: report (number of pages 9).
See:
The French British English Report
resume in 9 pages or,
The 21 page
Original French document
Le 14 août 1992 French Letter address to:
S.S.Q. MUTUEL D'ASSURANCE – GROUPE
Monsieur, Madame,
En ce qui concerne la S.S.Q. qui m'a remis pour le département de
l'immigration américaine une lettre de garantie de mes revenus, qui
jusqu'à date ont été payés, ils m'ont avisé
qu'ils arrêteraient les prestations. Ceci est dû au fait que
je n'ai pas d'autres rapports médicaux produits. Le docteur Brunet,
est le médecin que la S.S.Q. a personnellement endossé, après
avoir été informé, par moi-même, de la fraude
et du dépôt de documents pertinents. Documents que je leur ai
remis de main à main, en ce qui a trait à la manipulation des
dossiers médicaux par la S.T.R.S.M. et le syndicat. Ils m'ont avisé
qu'ils endossaient le choix de la S.T.R.S.M.
Ce même médecin, le docteur Brunet, a avisé mon avocat
qu'il ne veut plus produire d'autre rapport, spécifiant qu'il n'est
pas mon médecin traitant et, que le rapport produit l'an passé
n'a été fait que par bonté.
Malgré que ce médecin soit pourtant très sensibilisé
et, qu'il est le seul dont le rapport avait été retenu par
tous les organismes gouvernementaux, ayant plaidé sous serment, ce
rapport comme témoin expert stipulant que "mes chances de
rétablissement étaient sombres et sans issue".
Page 1 de 2
Cependant, malgré qu'il est le médecin que la S.S.Q. a
endossé, il ne veut plus leur remettre d'autre rapport. La S.S.Q.
par cette procédure ne cherche qu'à se retirer du dossier,
stipulant qu'il relève de moi de me trouver un médecin couvrant
mon invalidité totale.
Cette demande ne peut être agré par le fait que j'ai toujours
été en bonne santé. La possession de mon permis de
chauffeur, que je n'ai jamais perdu, et d'ailleurs ils en sont dûment
informés. Ce permis m'oblige à déposer un médical
de bonne santé à tous les renouvellements. Il est à
remarquer que cela fait trois (3) fois que je le renouvelle.
De plus, je dois vous aviser que ce montant, perçu par la S.S.Q.,
n'a jamais servi aux Etats-Unis. Il ne couvrait que les frais d'hypothèque
et d'électricité que je dois couvrir en ce qui concerne la
propriété de mon épouse. Je dépose les chèques
en garantie de paiement.
On ne peut m'accuser, ni moi, ni les Etats-Unis, d'avoir profité de
ces sommes, car elles ont été dépensées au
Québec et ce, pour la raison qu'elles sont, en soit, illégales
malgré qu'elles ont été couvertes par des organismes
du Québec.
Signé : Serge Morel
Page 2 de 2
_______________________________
*
